[nycphp-talk] cookies and experiation
John Campbell
jcampbell1 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 22:57:47 EDT 2011
The reason you cannot add 125 years is the 2038 problem. A simple solution
is to set the expiration date to Jan 1, 2038.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
-jc
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Margaret Waldman <mmwaldman at nyc.rr.com>wrote:
> Jim, I used the at 386 from ‘90-‘04. I even put Windows ‘95 on it and
> surfed the web. Granted it was slowed than you can imagine ...
>
> *From:* Jim Yi <jim at jimyi.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 10, 2011 10:44 AM
> *To:* NYPHP Talk <talk at lists.nyphp.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [nycphp-talk] cookies and experiation
>
> PHP has some useful predefined constants, particularly PHP_INT_MAX in
> this case (http://php.net/manual/en/reserved.constants.php). What you
> should really be doing while setting the cookie is ignoring time()
> completely, and just set the expiration time to the maximum size of an
> integer.
>
> setcookie(“name”, “val”, PHP_INT_MAX);
>
> This way, the cookie expires in 2038 for everyone, which is the furthest
> expiration you can set anyway.
>
> On a more theoretical note, there really isn't a need to set a cookie's
> expiration date beyond, let's say 5 years. For that cookie to even still be
> alive, you have to hope that the user:
> - is using the same computer for five years
> - has never reformatted the hard drive or re-installed a fresh OS
> - has never switched browsers
> - has never cleared their cookies
>
> I'd say a combination of all of the above is extremely rare, and I can't
> really think of a good use-case where a cookie would still be useful 5 years
> from now, given that the internet is constantly evolving.
>
> ---
> Jim Yi
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Margaret Waldman <mmwaldman at nyc.rr.com>wrote:
>
>> I wanted to create a cookie that basically never expires.
>>
>> time() + x
>>
>> We can live to say 100 or so, so say 125 years expiration would be good.
>>
>> time() + 3944700000
>>
>> But that number is too big.
>>
>> Intval says on a 32 bit machine max is 2147483647.
>>
>> So 2147483647 – time() = 4294967294, which is bigger than 2147483647
>>
>> 2147483647 = 68 years but because I’m adding time it grows bigger than
>> the bigger integer
>>
>> But I really can only do this 2147483647 - time() = 837178076 26 years
>>
>> But php wasn’t crapping out on 290000000 + time(), so what really is the
>> biggest integer
>>
>> Time today = 1310305571
>> Time tomorrow = 1310391971
>> Next year will be = 1341863171 (42 years)
>> In 20 years will be = 1372420841 (52 years)
>>
>> So, 2147483647 – time in 20 year (1372420841) = 775062806 approx 23 years
>>
>> The numbers don’t look quite right but at time increases the life time you
>> can extend in ints decreases.
>>
>> So, instead of just adding a value to time, I should
>>
>> $newLife = 2147483647 - time();
>>
>> setcookie(“name”, “val”, time() + newLife);
>>
>> I’m sure by the time, time() grows to be so big that this formula is an
>> issue, integers will be big enough to handle it?
>>
>> Anyway, does anyone know the real max size of an integer? Cause it ain’t
>> 2147483647 like the docs say for a 32 bit machine.
>>
>> Margaret Michele Waldman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
>> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>> http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110710/29cf4e73/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list