[nycphp-talk] Is this XML valid? (Matt!)
David Roth
davidalanroth at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 01:31:34 EDT 2009
> No, it's not an older method. There is no absolute definition of
> when to use
> elements versus attributes. There are, however, some attempts at
> defining
> general principles:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-eleatt.html
Thanks for the link and the code example, Mark. I certainly learned
something here and realize my XML existence has been somewhat sheltered.
In the absence of no absolute definition, I propose we refer to the
more common XML expected as "The Popular XML" version. :-)
I guess if approach XML as a programming language, then there are many
methods to make use of it. I've thought of XML as I do HTML as being a
format and not a programming language. I had a similar discussion
years ago when someone argued that nroff was a language because it
could do loops.
David Roth
PS: Matt, not Mark. Sorry about that. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090920/06fbe149/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list