[nycphp-talk] To Smarty Or Not to Smarty: That Is The Question
Paul M Jones
pmjones88 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 6 13:21:36 EDT 2006
On Sep 6, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Peter Sawczynec wrote:
> Rob:
>
> I believe that your comments revealed compelling reasons to go a
> Smarty-type
> template route.
Smarty *type*, perhaps, but not Smarty. ;-)
> Using a Smarty-type support template support structure to create:
> i) several different looking sites all driven efficiently by the
> same data,
> and
Easily do-able with something like Savant, Zend_View, or Solar_View,
all using PHP as the "template" markup, and which provide directory
fallbacks and on-demand helpers. (Fully object-oriented helpers,
BTW, not functions.)
> ii) gain performance by caching page(s) and/or data
Also easily do-able with PEAR Cache_Lite, Zend_Cache, or Solar_Cache.
> ...seems more like true genuine good reasons to use a Smarty than
> to solely
> go a Smarty-type route just so that designers can tweak the colors
> of tables as the months go by.
Agreed.
--
Paul M. Jones <http://paul-m-jones.com>
Solar: Simple Object Library and Application Repository
for PHP5. <http://solarphp.com>
Savant: The simple, elegant, and powerful solution for
templates in PHP. <http://phpsavant.com>
More information about the talk
mailing list