From pl at eskimo.com Mon May 12 00:45:37 2003
From: pl at eskimo.com (Peter Lehrer)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:45:37 -0400
Subject: removing and copying files with wildcards on free bsd
Message-ID: <00bd01c31841$60c57500$122c0242@default>
Is there a way in free bsd to rename or copy a whole group of files using
wildcards. For instance, i've been trying
mv *.htm *.php
or
mv sld???.htm sld???.php
but have been unable to do it in free bsd. I know it works in dos.
Peter Lehrer
From lists at redibishosting.com Thu May 1 10:41:30 2003
From: lists at redibishosting.com (Deidra McIntyre)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Open Source's 'Affirmative Action' Battle
Message-ID: <1949.172.131.208.245.1051800090.squirrel@www.myhostingadmin.com>
Oregon and Texas state legislatures have bills that may support the
Pro-Open Source cause. California's proposal is really anti-proprietary.
New York had a public hearing on the issue this week.
Here's the debate.
For government IT bids...
Pro-Open Source proponents argue that public institutions should be forced
to look at all bid options (open source and proprietary) and explain their
decisions because they are run off public dollars and for that reason a
different standard should be held for public versus private IT contracts.
Pro-Private proponents argue this is an issue of competition that should
be the same as it is in the private sector and that, at least according to
Microsoft, the total cost of ownership of open source implementation is
not necessarily less expensive than proprietary implementation.
Oregon, Texas, California:
http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/04/04/2231254.shtml?tid=4
New York:
http://linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2003043002026NWSWPB
*******
Deidra McIntyre
redIbis
http://www.redibis.com
From hans at nyphp.org Thu May 1 15:49:49 2003
From: hans at nyphp.org (Hans Zaunere)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam
Message-ID: <20030501194949.20601.qmail@web12808.mail.yahoo.com>
I was sent the below today at work and thought I'd pass it on.
> To prevent the harvesting of your or your organization's email address
> from your web pages, we recommend that you implement one of the
> two solutions offered below to replace your "mailto" links on html pages.
>
> 1) JavaScript Replacement
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would insert
> the following code, replacing "user" with the information to the left of
> the @ sign and replacing "site" with your host name.
>
>
>
>
> 2) ASCII Code Replacement
> You can replace the "@" sign in your mailto links with the ASCII code
> equivalent "@".
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would do the
> following:
>
> webmaster at nyphp.edu
>
> This will produce a link that says webmaster at nyphp.edu.
>
>
> Please see the following web page for more information on protecting your
> email address from spam:
>
> http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml
=====
Hans Zaunere
President, New York PHP
http://nyphp.org
hans at nyphp.org
From Ed at ComSimplicity.com Thu May 1 17:39:54 2003
From: Ed at ComSimplicity.com (Ed McCarroll)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:39:54 -0700
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam
In-Reply-To: <200305011950.h41Jnqot027712@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
Um, (unless I'm missing something) the methods below both produce
machine-readable email addresses. SpamBots are as capable as browsers
at executing JavaScript and then interpreting the results.
The neatest trick I've heard about had to do with a mouseover handler
that changed the href of an tag on the fly. I haven't tried it,
and am wondering if the same can be done for a screenshot image
depicting the address.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From Ed at ComSimplicity.com Thu May 1 17:59:52 2003
From: Ed at ComSimplicity.com (Ed McCarroll)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:59:52 -0700
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305012140.h41Ldmot030948@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
> ... the methods below both produce ...
I think I trimmed too much. I was referring to the following:
> 1) JavaScript Replacement
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would insert
> the following code, replacing "user" with the information to the left of
> the @ sign and replacing "site" with your host name.
>
>
>
>
> 2) ASCII Code Replacement
> You can replace the "@" sign in your mailto links with the ASCII code
> equivalent "@".
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would do the
> following:
>
> webmaster at nyphp.edu
>
> This will produce a link that says webmaster at nyphp.edu.
Sorry 'bout that.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From soazine at pop.mail.rcn.net Thu May 1 18:18:20 2003
From: soazine at pop.mail.rcn.net (soazine@pop.erols.com)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 18:18:20 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
Message-ID: <269620-22003541221820997@M2W066.mail2web.com>
I am not sure of a good client-side solution to masking emails; what I had
to do for my site (http://valsignalandet.com) is to build an entire
server-side feedback solution; something becoming popular now with many
sites. That way my email address is neither listed nor generated; it only
exists within server-side code.
Perhaps a bit heavy-handed but it has significantly cut down on spam that
way.
Phil
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Ed McCarroll Ed at ComSimplicity.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:59:44 -0400
To: talk at nyphp.org
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
> ... the methods below both produce ...
I think I trimmed too much. I was referring to the following:
> 1) JavaScript Replacement
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would
insert
> the following code, replacing "user" with the information to the left of
> the @ sign and replacing "site" with your host name.
>
>
>
>
> 2) ASCII Code Replacement
> You can replace the "@" sign in your mailto links with the ASCII code
> equivalent "@".
>
> For example, if your email address is webmaster at nyphp.edu, you would do
the
> following:
>
> webmaster at nyphp.edu
>
> This will produce a link that says webmaster at nyphp.edu.
Sorry 'bout that.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
From dkrook at hotmail.com Thu May 1 19:11:21 2003
From: dkrook at hotmail.com (D C Krook)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:11:21 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
Message-ID:
I'm a fan of the form, with server-side email, myself.
But should the need arise (having one's email address on an on-line resume
being the only justified reason I can think of), I would recommend
Hiveware's (free) Enkoder:
http://www.hiveware.com/enkoder_form.php
There is also a Mac OS X desktop app for the job as well:
http://www.hiveware.com/products.php
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
From wfan at encogent.com Thu May 1 19:22:58 2003
From: wfan at encogent.com (Wellington Fan)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:22:58 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam
In-Reply-To: <200305011950.h41Jnqq3027712@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
Hello Listfolk,
This is going to be a bit of a ramble...
Firstly, here's a pretty simple obfuscator:
/////////////////////////////////////////////
// See it at: http://www.jenniferdalton.com/encoder.php
function obfuscate($s,$type="html") {
for($i=0; $i < strlen($s); $i++) {
$encoded = sprintf("%02s",dechex(ord($s{$i})));
$hexscii .= '%'.$encoded;
$hexents .= ''.$encoded.';';
}
return ($type=="html"?$hexents:$hexscii);
}
/////////////////////////////////////////////
Now, here's another technique with a little problem; maybe someone has a
suggestion for fixing it....
Contents of z.html:
/////////////////////////////////////////////
MailerMail me!
/////////////////////////////////////////////
contents of z.php:
/////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////
See this pair at: http://www.jenniferdalton.com/z.html
The problem being that the window in which mailme.html was residing (the
opener) gets kinda fubar ("fubar", tech. jargon - See RFC - 3032 :
http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC3092/Output/index.html )
I tried a target="_blank" but you now get an intermediate fubar window.
Suggestions?
/////////////////////////////////////////////
The cdt.org report that Hans points to
(http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml) seems to suggest
that this character entity encoding is actually quite effective against
spambots. Can this be true? I would think that this html entity strategy
would be pretty easy to identify and defeat... Has anyone on the list
written a smart spambot? C'mon, 'fess up!
/////////////////////////////////////////////
Ok, one more ramble: spamgourmet kicks a**! nice disposable email addys,
that one can create on the fly... http://www.spamgourmet.com
--
spamme.8.beef23 at spamgourmet.com
From jsiegel1 at optonline.net Thu May 1 19:52:15 2003
From: jsiegel1 at optonline.net (Jeff)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:52:15 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305012312.h41NBSuf034737@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000201c3103c$b1771740$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
This is slightly off-topic but...in light of the discussion...I thought
I'd raise the issue. I'm interested in hearing other peoples views.
This morning I received a phone call from one of my clients who "might"
be considered a spammer. He's a headhunter who sends out job offers to a
very select group of people (about 10,000 people worldwide). All his job
offers are legitimate (he's been doing this since the early days of
email and has placed people in some very high-paying positions around
the globe). He does *not* hide who he is; he does *not* use a
non-existent email account; he does *not* use a non-existent web
address. Since his is *not* an opt-in list...as soon as someone says
"Remove Me" he removes them from his list. However...now he's getting
worried. When he sends emails to potential candidates that have an MSN
address...the emails get bounced back.
Again, let me emphasize that all his job offers are legitimate. They can
be viewed at his website (he hides the name of the employer and salary
range since...as a headhunter...he doesn't want anyone doing an end run
around him. However...he also has "entry-level" jobs for students and
does not make any money on those...he offers them as a "service" to the
industry).
The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put out
of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to deal
with spam.
I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
situation.
Jeff
From Ed at ComSimplicity.com Thu May 1 20:03:08 2003
From: Ed at ComSimplicity.com (Ed McCarroll)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:03:08 -0700
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305012352.h41NqMot036792@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
Jeff,
My definition of "spam" is unsolicited commercial email. Thus, I
would consider your friend to be a spammer. (I'm sure he's a very
nice spammer, but a spammer nonetheless.)
The tactics that you mention in your "he does not ..." list are not
a part of my definition of "spamming"; they are part of my definition
of "dishonest, obnoxious, stupid, arrogant spamming."
Regards,
Ed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From jim at bizcomputinginc.com Thu May 1 20:11:31 2003
From: jim at bizcomputinginc.com (Jim Hendricks)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:11:31 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
References: <200305012352.h41NqMoV036792@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <049f01c3103f$62e78530$6501a8c0@Notebook>
As cold and uncaring as it sounds, if stopping someone from sending
unsolicited e-mail is going to kill their business than they need to find
another way to do their business, or lose their business.
Spam is unsolicited e-mail. It doesn't matter weather you think you have a
legitimate reason to send Spam, it's still spam. I'm against Spam,
unsolicited sales calls on the phone, unsolicited faxes, junk mail and all
such things. We get commercials on TV which I have never minded, because
it's how TV gets it's money while I get TV for free. There are adverts in
newspapers and magazines because this either pays for the rag, or helps to
keep the subscription price down to a reasonable price. Mail is not free,
the price of mail continues to go up as the post office is struggling under
the increased load of mail where mail routes need to be made shorter and
more delivery people added. Fax is not free, I have to pay for the paper
and ink and if its a business line I have to pay for the message units used
to receive the fax. E-mail is not free, I have to pay a provider for it, or
buy the equipment and pay a provider to hook up to the net.
What's even worse about spam is how it's in your face. I have kids who are
receiving spam for all kinds of perverse crap. I don't get perverse crap in
the mail ( and even if i did, it would be in an envelop where I can choose
to throw it out before I even see the perversity ), I don't get calls from
phone sex people trying to get my business, but yet I get totally offensive
garbage in my e-mail.
I have no sympathy for anyone who uses unsolicited means to sell their
product or service. There are enough places to advertise right now in TV,
Radio, Newspapers, Magazines, and Internet web sites.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff"
To: "NYPHP Talk"
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
> This is slightly off-topic but...in light of the discussion...I thought
> I'd raise the issue. I'm interested in hearing other peoples views.
>
> This morning I received a phone call from one of my clients who "might"
> be considered a spammer. He's a headhunter who sends out job offers to a
> very select group of people (about 10,000 people worldwide). All his job
> offers are legitimate (he's been doing this since the early days of
> email and has placed people in some very high-paying positions around
> the globe). He does *not* hide who he is; he does *not* use a
> non-existent email account; he does *not* use a non-existent web
> address. Since his is *not* an opt-in list...as soon as someone says
> "Remove Me" he removes them from his list. However...now he's getting
> worried. When he sends emails to potential candidates that have an MSN
> address...the emails get bounced back.
>
> Again, let me emphasize that all his job offers are legitimate. They can
> be viewed at his website (he hides the name of the employer and salary
> range since...as a headhunter...he doesn't want anyone doing an end run
> around him. However...he also has "entry-level" jobs for students and
> does not make any money on those...he offers them as a "service" to the
> industry).
>
> The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put out
> of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to deal
> with spam.
>
> I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
> situation.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> --- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
>
>
>
>
From jsiegel1 at optonline.net Thu May 1 20:12:44 2003
From: jsiegel1 at optonline.net (Jeff)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:12:44 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020003.h42030uf037859@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000401c3103f$8ea88a20$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
Ed,
I agree with you but up to a point. Is all unsolicited commercial email
necessarily spam?
Nearly all the spam I've received has come from spammers who go to great
lengths to hide their true identity. You go to the website referred to
in their email and there is nothing there. When there *is* a website,
they offer no contact information other than a form-to-mail page.
So is there a difference between the spammer who hides who he is and the
spammer who is upfront and honest about who he is? I, for one, am not
sure what the right answer is to this question. (And believe me...I am
as plagued by spam as everyone else...I average 100 UCEs per day.)
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed McCarroll [mailto:Ed at ComSimplicity.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:03 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
Jeff,
My definition of "spam" is unsolicited commercial email. Thus, I would
consider your friend to be a spammer. (I'm sure he's a very nice
spammer, but a spammer nonetheless.)
The tactics that you mention in your "he does not ..." list are not a
part of my definition of "spamming"; they are part of my definition of
"dishonest, obnoxious, stupid, arrogant spamming."
Regards,
Ed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
From jsiegel at ezdatasolutions.com Thu May 1 20:19:11 2003
From: jsiegel at ezdatasolutions.com (Jeffrey Siegel)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:19:11 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020012.h420Bcuf038698@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000501c31040$75220120$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
Jim,
It's my kids that I worry most about...at least where spam is
concerned...so we are definitely in agreement there.
One part of me agrees that spam is spam no matter what level of
"honesty" may be behind it (in the case of my client). The other part of
me is concerned about my client.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hendricks [mailto:jim at bizcomputinginc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:12 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
As cold and uncaring as it sounds, if stopping someone from sending
unsolicited e-mail is going to kill their business than they need to
find another way to do their business, or lose their business.
Spam is unsolicited e-mail. It doesn't matter weather you think you
have a legitimate reason to send Spam, it's still spam. I'm against
Spam, unsolicited sales calls on the phone, unsolicited faxes, junk mail
and all such things. We get commercials on TV which I have never
minded, because it's how TV gets it's money while I get TV for free.
There are adverts in newspapers and magazines because this either pays
for the rag, or helps to keep the subscription price down to a
reasonable price. Mail is not free, the price of mail continues to go
up as the post office is struggling under the increased load of mail
where mail routes need to be made shorter and more delivery people
added. Fax is not free, I have to pay for the paper and ink and if its
a business line I have to pay for the message units used to receive the
fax. E-mail is not free, I have to pay a provider for it, or buy the
equipment and pay a provider to hook up to the net.
What's even worse about spam is how it's in your face. I have kids who
are receiving spam for all kinds of perverse crap. I don't get perverse
crap in the mail ( and even if i did, it would be in an envelop where I
can choose to throw it out before I even see the perversity ), I don't
get calls from phone sex people trying to get my business, but yet I get
totally offensive garbage in my e-mail.
I have no sympathy for anyone who uses unsolicited means to sell their
product or service. There are enough places to advertise right now in
TV, Radio, Newspapers, Magazines, and Internet web sites.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff"
To: "NYPHP Talk"
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
> This is slightly off-topic but...in light of the discussion...I
> thought I'd raise the issue. I'm interested in hearing other peoples
> views.
>
> This morning I received a phone call from one of my clients who
> "might" be considered a spammer. He's a headhunter who sends out job
> offers to a very select group of people (about 10,000 people
> worldwide). All his job offers are legitimate (he's been doing this
> since the early days of email and has placed people in some very
> high-paying positions around the globe). He does *not* hide who he is;
> he does *not* use a non-existent email account; he does *not* use a
> non-existent web address. Since his is *not* an opt-in list...as soon
> as someone says "Remove Me" he removes them from his list.
> However...now he's getting worried. When he sends emails to potential
> candidates that have an MSN address...the emails get bounced back.
>
> Again, let me emphasize that all his job offers are legitimate. They
> can be viewed at his website (he hides the name of the employer and
> salary range since...as a headhunter...he doesn't want anyone doing an
> end run around him. However...he also has "entry-level" jobs for
> students and does not make any money on those...he offers them as a
> "service" to the industry).
>
> The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put
> out of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to
> deal with spam.
>
> I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
> situation.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
From jim at bizcomputinginc.com Thu May 1 20:31:41 2003
From: jim at bizcomputinginc.com (Jim Hendricks)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:31:41 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
References: <200305020019.h420JGoV040278@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <04b301c31042$33fed310$6501a8c0@Notebook>
Jeff,
I'm not totally uncaring about your client, just pointing out that we live
in a changing world, and as a business owner myself I understand if I am not
able to change with the times, I don't deserve to be in business. What your
client is doing may have been acceptable when spam was at the level of junk
mail where every now and then I receive an e-mail about legitimate business
that is sensitive enough to recognize that there are moral limits as to the
content of the e-mail because there may be minors viewing the e-mail. But
if we make exceptions as to what e-mails are acceptable spam then the
spammers will figure out how to justify that their crap meets the
exceptions.
Your client needs to spend time investigating the other options available to
him rather than bewail the fact that the spammers have ruined for him a good
means of rapping out some business. He needs to look at the job services
like dice where he can register as a head hunter and receive information
about people looking for jobs that are soliciting his type of e-mails. He
needs to look at getting his own site advertised well enough that job
applicants would come to his site and enroll for his e-mails. To act as if
the world is over because a means of marketing is going away is like crying
the sky is falling!
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Siegel"
To: "NYPHP Talk"
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
> Jim,
>
> It's my kids that I worry most about...at least where spam is
> concerned...so we are definitely in agreement there.
>
> One part of me agrees that spam is spam no matter what level of
> "honesty" may be behind it (in the case of my client). The other part of
> me is concerned about my client.
>
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Hendricks [mailto:jim at bizcomputinginc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:12 PM
> To: NYPHP Talk
> Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
>
>
> As cold and uncaring as it sounds, if stopping someone from sending
> unsolicited e-mail is going to kill their business than they need to
> find another way to do their business, or lose their business.
>
> Spam is unsolicited e-mail. It doesn't matter weather you think you
> have a legitimate reason to send Spam, it's still spam. I'm against
> Spam, unsolicited sales calls on the phone, unsolicited faxes, junk mail
> and all such things. We get commercials on TV which I have never
> minded, because it's how TV gets it's money while I get TV for free.
> There are adverts in newspapers and magazines because this either pays
> for the rag, or helps to keep the subscription price down to a
> reasonable price. Mail is not free, the price of mail continues to go
> up as the post office is struggling under the increased load of mail
> where mail routes need to be made shorter and more delivery people
> added. Fax is not free, I have to pay for the paper and ink and if its
> a business line I have to pay for the message units used to receive the
> fax. E-mail is not free, I have to pay a provider for it, or buy the
> equipment and pay a provider to hook up to the net.
>
> What's even worse about spam is how it's in your face. I have kids who
> are receiving spam for all kinds of perverse crap. I don't get perverse
> crap in the mail ( and even if i did, it would be in an envelop where I
> can choose to throw it out before I even see the perversity ), I don't
> get calls from phone sex people trying to get my business, but yet I get
> totally offensive garbage in my e-mail.
>
> I have no sympathy for anyone who uses unsolicited means to sell their
> product or service. There are enough places to advertise right now in
> TV, Radio, Newspapers, Magazines, and Internet web sites.
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff"
> To: "NYPHP Talk"
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:52 PM
> Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
>
>
> > This is slightly off-topic but...in light of the discussion...I
> > thought I'd raise the issue. I'm interested in hearing other peoples
> > views.
> >
> > This morning I received a phone call from one of my clients who
> > "might" be considered a spammer. He's a headhunter who sends out job
> > offers to a very select group of people (about 10,000 people
> > worldwide). All his job offers are legitimate (he's been doing this
> > since the early days of email and has placed people in some very
> > high-paying positions around the globe). He does *not* hide who he is;
>
> > he does *not* use a non-existent email account; he does *not* use a
> > non-existent web address. Since his is *not* an opt-in list...as soon
> > as someone says "Remove Me" he removes them from his list.
> > However...now he's getting worried. When he sends emails to potential
> > candidates that have an MSN address...the emails get bounced back.
> >
> > Again, let me emphasize that all his job offers are legitimate. They
> > can be viewed at his website (he hides the name of the employer and
> > salary range since...as a headhunter...he doesn't want anyone doing an
>
> > end run around him. However...he also has "entry-level" jobs for
> > students and does not make any money on those...he offers them as a
> > "service" to the industry).
> >
> > The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put
> > out of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to
> > deal with spam.
> >
> > I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
> > situation.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
>
>
>
>
From Ed at ComSimplicity.com Thu May 1 20:35:47 2003
From: Ed at ComSimplicity.com (Ed McCarroll)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:35:47 -0700
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020012.h420Crot039454@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
Jeff,
> I agree with you but up to a point. Is all unsolicited commercial
> email necessarily spam?
Yes, it's spam. Spam is unsolicited commercial email. That's the plain,
simple definition.
You seem to think that calling it "spam" means that it's dirty, rotten,
and evil. Perhaps we'd do better trying to discuss whether there is or
is not an acceptable form of spam.
I think any unsolicited commercial email is offensive. I also think
it should be illegal for spammers to use the dishonest tactics to
which you refer. But these are two separate issues. And many good
people would disagree with my position on either.
Regards,
Ed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From jsiegel1 at optonline.net Thu May 1 20:48:40 2003
From: jsiegel1 at optonline.net (Jeff)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:48:40 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020032.h420Vmuf041177@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000101c31044$95969480$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
Jim,
Very, very well stated. I've been preparing a "speech" similar to your
second paragraph in anticipation of my client's follow-up phone call.
I also think that you are correct to point out about the "moral limits"
of the email content and that is the bigger issue.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hendricks [mailto:jim at bizcomputinginc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:32 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
Jeff,
I'm not totally uncaring about your client, just pointing out that we
live in a changing world, and as a business owner myself I understand if
I am not able to change with the times, I don't deserve to be in
business. What your client is doing may have been acceptable when spam
was at the level of junk mail where every now and then I receive an
e-mail about legitimate business that is sensitive enough to recognize
that there are moral limits as to the content of the e-mail because
there may be minors viewing the e-mail. But if we make exceptions as to
what e-mails are acceptable spam then the spammers will figure out how
to justify that their crap meets the exceptions.
Your client needs to spend time investigating the other options
available to him rather than bewail the fact that the spammers have
ruined for him a good means of rapping out some business. He needs to
look at the job services like dice where he can register as a head
hunter and receive information about people looking for jobs that are
soliciting his type of e-mails. He needs to look at getting his own
site advertised well enough that job applicants would come to his site
and enroll for his e-mails. To act as if the world is over because a
means of marketing is going away is like crying the sky is falling!
Jim
From jsiegel1 at optonline.net Thu May 1 20:48:40 2003
From: jsiegel1 at optonline.net (Jeff)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:48:40 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020036.h420Zduf041966@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000001c31044$936b01f0$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
Ed,
I think Jim raised an important point in his email concerning the "moral
limits" of email content. I don't consider unsolicited catalogs via
snail mail to be offensive though, when the Frederick's of Hollywood
catalog shows up (I swear! I NEVER ORDERED ANYTHING FROM THEM!) that's
when I get angry.
And so while I get annoyed when I'm asked, for the umpteenth time, to
get Gevalia coffee, I get very angry when I receive pornographic
material.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed McCarroll [mailto:Ed at ComSimplicity.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:36 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
Jeff,
> I agree with you but up to a point. Is all unsolicited commercial
> email necessarily spam?
Yes, it's spam. Spam is unsolicited commercial email. That's the
plain, simple definition.
You seem to think that calling it "spam" means that it's dirty, rotten,
and evil. Perhaps we'd do better trying to discuss whether there is or
is not an acceptable form of spam.
I think any unsolicited commercial email is offensive. I also think it
should be illegal for spammers to use the dishonest tactics to which you
refer. But these are two separate issues. And many good people would
disagree with my position on either.
Regards,
Ed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ed McCarroll MailTo:Ed at ComSimplicity.com
ComSimplicity (310) 838-4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
From chris at psydeshow.org Thu May 1 20:51:48 2003
From: chris at psydeshow.org (Chris Snyder)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:51:48 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam
In-Reply-To: <200305011950.h41JnqvF027712@parsec.nyphp.org>
References: <200305011950.h41JnqvF027712@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <3EB1C124.5020309@psydeshow.org>
Hans Zaunere wrote:
>I was sent the below today at work and thought I'd pass it on.
>
>>To prevent the harvesting of your or your organization's email address
>>from your web pages, we recommend that you implement one of the
>>two solutions offered below to replace your "mailto" links on html pages.
>>
I'm gonna get flamed by the text-only and accessibility camps for this,
but another very effective way to advertise your email address without
having it picked up by spambots is to use an image instead. I have a PHP
label generator at http://chxo.com/labelgen/ that makes creating them a
snap. There's a show source link on the page as well.
chris.
From smanes at magpie.com Thu May 1 21:10:57 2003
From: smanes at magpie.com (Steve Manes)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 21:10:57 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305012352.h41NqMst036792@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.2.20030501204639.015f0468@192.168.111.6>
At 07:52 PM 5/1/2003 -0400, Jeff wrote:
>The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put out
>of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to deal
>with spam.
>
>I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
>situation.
He has every right to panic because they're not just talking. In the case
of AOL, they're already doing. I've forgotten the formula I saw a couple
of weeks ago but if you send X emails to non-existent/expired AOL accounts
in X days, you're automatically blackholed. Worse, your mail will just
disappear into the bit bucket without a bounce.
I know what the "official" definition is, but I don't think spam is
unsolicited commercial email. It's unsolicited, unwanted bulk email. It's
a lot like pornography: you know it when you see it. If I was out of work,
living on ramen and water, and I landed a job because I was on that
headhunter's list, I'd have a very different opinion of those mailings than
someone who was happily employed at 3x the salary offered.
I've gotten lots of spam that wasn't commercial, like chain letters
demanding that I send a bunch of copies to my annoyed friends, political
demands that I Bitch To Bush and the "prayer for the day" crap I used to
get a couple of years ago. Virus email is probably the most evil form of
spam even though there's rarely a commercial purpose to it. By the same
token, the service advisories that Watchguard sends its customers and which
I never opted into are both bulk and commercial, yet they contain
information that I want.
Your friend is probably going to have to make some adjustments. Sending a
single job description out to 10,000 people is excessive. I think he might
want to trickle out some "re-opt" emails to his subscribers and in the
future send email only to those who respond affirmatively.
From jsiegel1 at optonline.net Thu May 1 21:23:42 2003
From: jsiegel1 at optonline.net (Jeff)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 21:23:42 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
In-Reply-To: <200305020111.h421Aguf045526@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <000001c31049$78858860$6501a8c0@EZDSDELL>
Steve,
"I think he might want to trickle out some "re-opt" emails to his
subscribers and in the
future send email only to those who respond affirmatively."
I believe this is the way to go.
And I should clarify one small point. He doesn't send the same job
description to 10,000 people. He sends different job descriptions to
different people based on their "specialty" areas.
As was noted in another email...my client is going to have to rethink
how he does business.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Manes [mailto:smanes at magpie.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:11 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] Masking Emails and Avoiding Spam - OOPS
At 07:52 PM 5/1/2003 -0400, Jeff wrote:
>The point is that my client is panicking. He's worried he'll be put out
>of business now that AOL, MSN, et al., are talking about ways to deal
>with spam.
>
>I'm interested to hear what others may think about this particular
>situation.
He has every right to panic because they're not just talking. In the
case
of AOL, they're already doing. I've forgotten the formula I saw a
couple
of weeks ago but if you send X emails to non-existent/expired AOL
accounts
in X days, you're automatically blackholed. Worse, your mail will just
disappear into the bit bucket without a bounce.
I know what the "official" definition is, but I don't think spam is
unsolicited commercial email. It's unsolicited, unwanted bulk email.
It's
a lot like pornography: you know it when you see it. If I was out of
work,
living on ramen and water, and I landed a job because I was on that
headhunter's list, I'd have a very different opinion of those mailings
than
someone who was happily employed at 3x the salary offered.
I've gotten lots of spam that wasn't commercial, like chain letters
demanding that I send a bunch of copies to my annoyed friends, political
demands that I Bitch To Bush and the "prayer for the day" crap I used to
get a couple of years ago. Virus email is probably the most evil form
of
spam even though there's rarely a commercial purpose to it. By the same
token, the service advisories that Watchguard sends its customers and
which
I never opted into are both bulk and commercial, yet they contain
information that I want.
Your friend is probably going to have to make some adjustments. Sending
a
single job description out to 10,000 people is excessive. I think he
might
want to trickle out some "re-opt" emails to his subscribers and in the
future send email only to those who respond affirmatively.
--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
From jfreeman at amnh.org Thu May 1 22:21:31 2003
From: jfreeman at amnh.org (Joshua S. Freeman)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:21:31 -0400
Subject: gnubie questions regarding working with form contents...
In-Reply-To: <200305020051.h420ponl044415@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
I have a page with PHP doing the following things so far:
1) if NOT submitting, then display a form.
2) if submitting, echo the contents of the submission and insert into the
values into a database.
The insert statement is working just fine.
I'm having some problems with the echoing of the contents to the page.
Here is the echo statement I'm using to echo the inserted values:
----------snip------------
while (list($name, $value) = each($HTTP_POST_VARS)) {
echo "$name = $value .\
";
----------snip------------
problem number one is: I forgot how to do that using 'foreach' instead of
while() each()...
problem number two is: because of contents of $HTTP_POST_VARS, "submit =
submit " is coming up as a result of the
echo "$name = $value .\
"
statement.
In other words, in addition to showing the submitter the values of his/her
submission, s/he's also seeing that 'submit=submit' is a value too...
The next problem is that I need to take the submitted name/value pairs and
format and send an email with them to one email address... I have no idea
how do that though I know it involves $HTTP_POST_VARS again...
I want to do this all on one page.
Any help/pointers appreciated!
Thanks!
Joshua
From greg at mbwpartners.net Thu May 1 22:38:08 2003
From: greg at mbwpartners.net (Greg Wilson)
Date: 01 May 2003 22:38:08 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] gnubie questions regarding working with form
contents...
In-Reply-To: <200305020222.h422LZt3048134@parsec.nyphp.org>
References: <200305020222.h422LZt3048134@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <1051843087.27932.8.camel@banner>
On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 22:21, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
> I have a page with PHP doing the following things so far:
>
> 1) if NOT submitting, then display a form.
>
> 2) if submitting, echo the contents of the submission and insert into the
> values into a database.
>
> The insert statement is working just fine.
>
> I'm having some problems with the echoing of the contents to the page.
>
>
> Here is the echo statement I'm using to echo the inserted values:
>
> ----------snip------------
>
> while (list($name, $value) = each($HTTP_POST_VARS)) {
>
> echo "$name = $value .\
";
>
> ----------snip------------
>
>
> problem number one is: I forgot how to do that using 'foreach' instead of
> while() each()...
try:
foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
}
>
> problem number two is: because of contents of $HTTP_POST_VARS, "submit =
> submit " is coming up as a result of the
>
> echo "$name = $value .\
"
>
> statement.
>
> In other words, in addition to showing the submitter the values of his/her
> submission, s/he's also seeing that 'submit=submit' is a value too...
>
before your foreach:
unset ($HTTP_POST_VARS['submit']);
this will pull it out of the array
>
> The next problem is that I need to take the submitted name/value pairs and
> format and send an email with them to one email address... I have no idea
> how do that though I know it involves $HTTP_POST_VARS again...
>
change the foreach statement above to:
foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
$message .= "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
}
and then use the mail function, something like:
mail($contactemail, $subject, $message, $headers);
to send the values.
> I want to do this all on one page.
>
> Any help/pointers appreciated!
>
hope that helps!
greg
> Thanks!
>
> Joshua
>
>
>
> --- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
>
>
From jfreeman at amnh.org Thu May 1 22:39:59 2003
From: jfreeman at amnh.org (Joshua S. Freeman)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:39:59 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] gnubie questions regarding working with form
contents...
In-Reply-To: <200305020238.h422cFnl049108@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
brilliant Greg..
I'll try it all out tomorrow and let everyone know how it worked out.
Thanks!
g'night!
J.
On 5/1/03 10:38 PM, "Greg Wilson" wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 22:21, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
>> I have a page with PHP doing the following things so far:
>>
>> 1) if NOT submitting, then display a form.
>>
>> 2) if submitting, echo the contents of the submission and insert into the
>> values into a database.
>>
>> The insert statement is working just fine.
>>
>> I'm having some problems with the echoing of the contents to the page.
>>
>>
>> Here is the echo statement I'm using to echo the inserted values:
>>
>> ----------snip------------
>>
>> while (list($name, $value) = each($HTTP_POST_VARS)) {
>>
>> echo "$name = $value .\
";
>>
>> ----------snip------------
>>
>>
>> problem number one is: I forgot how to do that using 'foreach' instead of
>> while() each()...
>
> try:
> foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
> echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
> }
>
>
>>
>> problem number two is: because of contents of $HTTP_POST_VARS, "submit =
>> submit " is coming up as a result of the
>>
>> echo "$name = $value .\
"
>>
>> statement.
>>
>> In other words, in addition to showing the submitter the values of his/her
>> submission, s/he's also seeing that 'submit=submit' is a value too...
>>
>
> before your foreach:
> unset ($HTTP_POST_VARS['submit']);
> this will pull it out of the array
>
>>
>> The next problem is that I need to take the submitted name/value pairs and
>> format and send an email with them to one email address... I have no idea
>> how do that though I know it involves $HTTP_POST_VARS again...
>>
>
> change the foreach statement above to:
> foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
> echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
> $message .= "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
> }
>
> and then use the mail function, something like:
> mail($contactemail, $subject, $message, $headers);
> to send the values.
>
>
>> I want to do this all on one page.
>>
>> Any help/pointers appreciated!
>>
>
> hope that helps!
>
> greg
>
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Joshua
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---
>
>
>
From pinyo at nyc.rr.com Thu May 1 22:58:08 2003
From: pinyo at nyc.rr.com (Pinyo Bhulipongsanon)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 22:58:08 -0400
Subject: Pass by reference has been deprecated?
References: <200305020238.h422cFtx049108@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <007901c31056$a8da3350$10c8a8c0@hewlettlydtpep>
Hello,
I need your expert help please. Can someone tell me more information about
this warning? If the pass-by-reference is going away, then how do I change
the value of multiple variables through a function?
Thank you so much for your help.
Pinyo
Warning: Call-time pass-by-reference has been deprecated - argument passed
by value; If you would like to pass it by reference, modify the declaration
of [runtime function name](). If you would like to enable call-time
pass-by-reference, you can set allow_call_time_pass_reference to true in
your INI file. However, future versions may not support this any longer. in
/usr/www/users/markzill/marktaw/commenter/commenter.php on line 22
From greg at mbwpartners.net Thu May 1 23:00:41 2003
From: greg at mbwpartners.net (Greg Wilson)
Date: 01 May 2003 23:00:41 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] gnubie questions regarding working with form
contents...
In-Reply-To: <200305020240.h422e4t3049870@parsec.nyphp.org>
References: <200305020240.h422e4t3049870@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID: <1051844441.27932.24.camel@banner>
Joshua
You'll probably want to dump the POST variables into a different array
before you unset. Try:
$arr = array();
$arr = $HTTP_POST_VARS; // or is it $arr[] = $HTTP_POST_VARS;
unset($arr['submit']);
foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
$message .= $key ." = ". $value ." \
";
}
Good luck!
greg
On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 22:40, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
> brilliant Greg..
>
> I'll try it all out tomorrow and let everyone know how it worked out.
>
> Thanks!
>
> g'night!
>
> J.
>
> On 5/1/03 10:38 PM, "Greg Wilson" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 22:21, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
From nyphp at websapp.com Thu May 1 23:12:26 2003
From: nyphp at websapp.com (Daniel Kushner)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 23:12:26 -0400
Subject: [nycphp-talk] gnubie questions regarding working with form contents...
In-Reply-To: <200305020301.h4230lxt051658@parsec.nyphp.org>
Message-ID:
> $arr = array();
> $arr = $HTTP_POST_VARS; // or is it $arr[] = $HTTP_POST_VARS;
Please note that there is no reason to declare $arr as an array (and create
new array). $arr = $_POST copies the $_POST array to the new variable $arr.
--Daniel
From gw.nyphp at gwprogramming.com Thu May 1 23:11:52 2003
From: gw.nyphp at gwprogramming.com (George Webb)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 23:11:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [nycphp-talk] gnubie questions regarding working with form contents...
Message-ID: <200305020311.h423Brop010876@gw00.com>
J.,
Don't forget that if you're outputting your results
to a web (HTML) page, you need to run htmlspecialchars() on
them so that any HTML entities will appear properly:
foreach ( $arr as $key => $value ) {
$key = htmlspecialchars ( $key );
$value = htmlspecialchars ( $value );
echo "Key: $key; Value: $value \
";
}
As a shortcut, if you know your "keys" are all already
safe for HTML, you can skip the htmlspecialchars() for each $key,
and just escape the "values." (But often you never *really* know;
someone could easily spoof your form and repost their own key/value
pairs.)
A lot of web applications neglect this HTML escaping
issue, which causes problems, including security risks! Example:
the user could type a
WELCOME TO A GREAT SITE!
RETRIEVE YOUR LOGIN INFO
You can get your
login information by entering either your login name or your email
address below. Your password will be sent to the email address that we
currently have on file for you.